Palau vs Seychelles: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Palau
94.47
in 2014
Seychelles
94.56
in 2014
Palau rank
14th
Seychelles rank
13th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Palau
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 94.56 against 94.47 in Palau, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palau ahead.
Palau ranks 14th and Seychelles ranks 13th of 181 countries.
Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.82 | 75.71 | 12.11 | Palau |
| 2010s | 93.85 | 91.19 | 2.66 | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Palau or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 94.56 against 94.47 in Palau as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Palau and Seychelles?
- 0.09, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Seychelles?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Palau and Seychelles rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Palau ranks 14th and Seychelles ranks 13th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.