Oman vs Taiwan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Oman
94.11
in 2014
Taiwan
93.76
in 2014
Oman rank
17th
Taiwan rank
19th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Oman
  • Taiwan
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Oman currently reports 94.11 against 93.76 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.35.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan ahead.

Oman ranks 17th and Taiwan ranks 19th of 181 countries.

Taiwan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Taiwan Difference Ahead
2000s 93.4 93.92 0.5155 Taiwan
2010s 93.08 93.8 0.7182 Taiwan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Oman or Taiwan?
Oman, at 94.11 against 93.76 in Taiwan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Oman and Taiwan?
0.35, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Taiwan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Oman and Taiwan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Oman ranks 17th and Taiwan ranks 19th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.