New Zealand vs Slovenia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
New Zealand
91.89
in 2014
Slovenia
91.8
in 2014
New Zealand rank
35th
Slovenia rank
36th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- New Zealand
- Slovenia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 91.89 against 91.8 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 35th and Slovenia ranks 36th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.62 | 85.39 | 4.23 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 91.51 | 92.1 | 0.5825 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), New Zealand or Slovenia?
- New Zealand, at 91.89 against 91.8 in Slovenia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 0.09, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovenia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do New Zealand and Slovenia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- New Zealand ranks 35th and Slovenia ranks 36th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.