Netherlands vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Netherlands
89.23
in 2014
Pakistan
88.7
in 2014
Netherlands rank
48th
Pakistan rank
50th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Netherlands
- Pakistan
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 89.23 against 88.7 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.53.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Pakistan ahead.
Netherlands ranks 48th and Pakistan ranks 50th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.25 | 82.89 | 4.35 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 88.91 | 89.25 | 0.3421 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Netherlands or Pakistan?
- Netherlands, at 89.23 against 88.7 in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Netherlands and Pakistan?
- 0.53, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Pakistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Netherlands and Pakistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Netherlands ranks 48th and Pakistan ranks 50th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.