Namibia vs Serbia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Namibia
74.49
in 2014
Serbia
72.63
in 2014
Namibia rank
125th
Serbia rank
128th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Namibia
  • Serbia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 74.49 against 72.63 in Serbia, a difference of 1.86.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 125th and Serbia ranks 128th of 181 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 74.87 57.83 17.04 Namibia
2010s 79.01 70.97 8.04 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Namibia or Serbia?
Namibia, at 74.49 against 72.63 in Serbia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Namibia and Serbia?
1.86, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Serbia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Namibia and Serbia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Namibia ranks 125th and Serbia ranks 128th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.