Morocco vs Portugal: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Morocco
89.32
in 2014
Portugal
90.12
in 2014
Morocco rank
47th
Portugal rank
44th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Morocco
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 90.12 against 89.32 in Morocco, a difference of 0.8.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Portugal ahead.
Morocco ranks 47th and Portugal ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.17 | 89.34 | 6.17 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 88.97 | 90.16 | 1.19 | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Morocco or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 90.12 against 89.32 in Morocco as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Morocco and Portugal?
- 0.8, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Portugal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Morocco and Portugal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Morocco ranks 47th and Portugal ranks 44th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.