Morocco vs Netherlands: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Morocco
89.32
in 2014
Netherlands
89.23
in 2014
Morocco rank
46th
Netherlands rank
47th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Morocco
- Netherlands
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 89.32 against 89.23 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Netherlands ahead.
Morocco ranks 46th and Netherlands ranks 47th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.17 | 87.25 | 4.07 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 88.97 | 88.91 | 0.0627 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Morocco or Netherlands?
- Morocco, at 89.32 against 89.23 in Netherlands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Morocco and Netherlands?
- 0.09, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Netherlands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Morocco and Netherlands rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Morocco ranks 46th and Netherlands ranks 47th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.