Montenegro vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Montenegro
89.05
in 2014
Morocco
89.32
in 2014
Montenegro rank
48th
Morocco rank
46th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Montenegro
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 89.32 against 89.05 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 48th and Morocco ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.24 | 85.2 | 1.04 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 88.65 | 88.97 | 0.3281 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Montenegro or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 89.32 against 89.05 in Montenegro as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Montenegro and Morocco?
- 0.27, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Morocco?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Montenegro and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Montenegro ranks 48th and Morocco ranks 46th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.