Mongolia vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Mongolia
54.16
in 2014
Uganda
46.61
in 2014
Mongolia rank
161st
Uganda rank
163rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Mongolia
- Uganda
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 54.16 against 46.61 in Uganda, a difference of 7.55.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uganda ahead.
Mongolia ranks 161st and Uganda ranks 163rd of 184 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.13 | 2.35 | 11.78 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 46.41 | 36.85 | 9.56 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Mongolia or Uganda?
- Mongolia, at 54.16 against 46.61 in Uganda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Mongolia and Uganda?
- 7.55, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mongolia and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Mongolia ranks 161st and Uganda ranks 163rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.