Mongolia vs Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Mongolia
54.16
in 2014
Sudan
46.17
in 2014
Mongolia rank
161st
Sudan rank
164th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Mongolia
- Sudan
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 54.16 against 46.17 in Sudan, a difference of 7.99.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sudan ahead.
Mongolia ranks 161st and Sudan ranks 164th of 184 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.13 | 0 | 14.13 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 46.41 | 15.16 | 31.24 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Mongolia or Sudan?
- Mongolia, at 54.16 against 46.17 in Sudan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Mongolia and Sudan?
- 7.99, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sudan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mongolia and Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Mongolia ranks 161st and Sudan ranks 164th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.