Moldova vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Moldova
73.34
in 2014
Namibia
74.49
in 2014
Moldova rank
126th
Namibia rank
125th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Moldova
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 74.49 against 73.34 in Moldova, a difference of 1.15.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 126th and Namibia ranks 125th of 181 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.3 | 74.87 | 25.57 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 67.67 | 79.01 | 11.34 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Moldova or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 74.49 against 73.34 in Moldova as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Moldova and Namibia?
- 1.15, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Moldova and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Moldova ranks 126th and Namibia ranks 125th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.