What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Micronesia (Federated States of) and United Kingdom?

0.09, with Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and United Kingdom?

10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Micronesia (Federated States of) vs United Kingdom: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)

Micronesia (Federated States of)

87.99

in 2014

United Kingdom

87.9

in 2014

Micronesia (Federated States of) rank

57th

United Kingdom rank

58th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time

Micronesia (Federated States of)
United Kingdom

How they compare

Micronesia (Federated States of) currently reports 87.99 against 87.9 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 57th and United Kingdom ranks 58th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia (Federated States of) averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Micronesia (Federated States of)	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
2000s	81.09	80.24	0.8465	Micronesia (Federated States of)
2010s	86.75	87.27	0.5279	United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Micronesia (Federated States of) or United Kingdom?: Micronesia (Federated States of), at 87.99 against 87.9 in United Kingdom as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Micronesia (Federated States of) and United Kingdom?: 0.09, with Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and United Kingdom?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and United Kingdom rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?: Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 57th and United Kingdom ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia (Federated States of) vs United Kingdom: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15). Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/micronesia-fed-sts/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/micronesia-fed-sts/united-kingdom/">Micronesia (Federated States of) vs United Kingdom: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.