Mexico vs Serbia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Mexico
73.02
in 2014
Serbia, Republic of
72.63
in 2014
Mexico rank
129th
Serbia, Republic of rank
130th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Mexico
- Serbia, Republic of
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 73.02 against 72.63 in Serbia, Republic of, a difference of 0.39.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 129th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 130th of 183 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Serbia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.99 | 57.83 | 4.16 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 71.9 | 70.97 | 0.9268 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Mexico or Serbia, Republic of?
- Mexico, at 73.02 against 72.63 in Serbia, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Mexico and Serbia, Republic of?
- 0.39, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Serbia, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mexico and Serbia, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Mexico ranks 129th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 130th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.