Mexico vs Moldova: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Mexico
73.02
in 2014
Moldova
73.34
in 2014
Mexico rank
127th
Moldova rank
126th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Mexico
  • Moldova
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 73.34 against 73.02 in Mexico, a difference of 0.32.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 127th and Moldova ranks 126th of 181 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 61.99 49.3 12.69 Mexico
2010s 71.9 67.67 4.23 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Mexico or Moldova?
Moldova, at 73.34 against 73.02 in Mexico as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Mexico and Moldova?
0.32, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Moldova?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mexico and Moldova rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Mexico ranks 127th and Moldova ranks 126th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.