Mauritius vs Taiwan: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Mauritius
93.93
in 2014
Taiwan
93.76
in 2014
Mauritius rank
18th
Taiwan rank
19th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Mauritius
- Taiwan
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 93.93 against 93.76 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan ahead.
Mauritius ranks 18th and Taiwan ranks 19th of 181 countries.
Taiwan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.69 | 93.92 | 3.22 | Taiwan |
| 2010s | 93.32 | 93.8 | 0.4815 | Taiwan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Mauritius or Taiwan?
- Mauritius, at 93.93 against 93.76 in Taiwan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Mauritius and Taiwan?
- 0.17, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Taiwan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Taiwan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Mauritius ranks 18th and Taiwan ranks 19th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.