Mauritius vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Mauritius
93.93
in 2014
Sri Lanka
94.29
in 2014
Mauritius rank
18th
Sri Lanka rank
15th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Mauritius
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 94.29 against 93.93 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.36.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.69 | 85.36 | 5.33 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 93.32 | 91.94 | 1.38 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Mauritius or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 94.29 against 93.93 in Mauritius as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 0.36, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Mauritius ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.