Maldives vs Mozambique, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Maldives
77.95
in 2014
Mozambique, Republic of
78.13
in 2014
Maldives rank
119th
Mozambique, Republic of rank
116th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Maldives
- Mozambique, Republic of
How they compare
Mozambique, Republic of currently reports 78.13 against 77.95 in Maldives, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 119th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 116th of 183 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Mozambique, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.65 | 69.36 | 4.29 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 76.58 | 75.39 | 1.2 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Maldives or Mozambique, Republic of?
- Mozambique, Republic of, at 78.13 against 77.95 in Maldives as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Maldives and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 0.18, with Mozambique, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Maldives and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Maldives ranks 119th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 116th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.