Luxembourg vs Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Luxembourg
81.33
in 2014
Vanuatu
80.97
in 2014
Luxembourg rank
91st
Vanuatu rank
94th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Luxembourg
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 81.33 against 80.97 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.36.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 91st and Vanuatu ranks 94th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.97 | 71.99 | 4.98 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 79.24 | 80.94 | 1.7 | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Luxembourg or Vanuatu?
- Luxembourg, at 81.33 against 80.97 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Luxembourg and Vanuatu?
- 0.36, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Vanuatu?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Luxembourg and Vanuatu rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Luxembourg ranks 91st and Vanuatu ranks 94th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.