Luxembourg vs Switzerland: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Luxembourg
81.33
in 2014
Switzerland
80.97
in 2014
Luxembourg rank
92nd
Switzerland rank
95th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Luxembourg
- Switzerland
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 81.33 against 80.97 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.36.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Switzerland ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 92nd and Switzerland ranks 95th of 183 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.97 | 80.15 | 3.17 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 79.24 | 80.19 | 0.9517 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Luxembourg or Switzerland?
- Luxembourg, at 81.33 against 80.97 in Switzerland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Luxembourg and Switzerland?
- 0.36, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Switzerland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Luxembourg and Switzerland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Luxembourg ranks 92nd and Switzerland ranks 95th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.