Luxembourg vs Spain: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Luxembourg
81.33
in 2014
Spain
81.68
in 2014
Luxembourg rank
91st
Spain rank
89th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Spain
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Spain currently reports 81.68 against 81.33 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.35.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 91st and Spain ranks 89th of 181 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Spain Difference Ahead
2000s 76.97 83.87 6.9 Spain
2010s 79.24 82.26 3.02 Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Luxembourg or Spain?
Spain, at 81.68 against 81.33 in Luxembourg as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Luxembourg and Spain?
0.35, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Spain?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Luxembourg and Spain rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Luxembourg ranks 91st and Spain ranks 89th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.