Liberia vs Puerto Rico: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Liberia
83.1
in 2014
Puerto Rico
82.57
in 2014
Liberia rank
82nd
Puerto Rico rank
84th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Liberia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 83.1 against 82.57 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.53.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Liberia ranks 82nd and Puerto Rico ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.44 | 79.83 | 13.39 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 80.38 | 82.51 | 2.12 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Liberia or Puerto Rico?
- Liberia, at 83.1 against 82.57 in Puerto Rico as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Liberia and Puerto Rico?
- 0.53, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Puerto Rico?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Liberia and Puerto Rico rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Liberia ranks 82nd and Puerto Rico ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.