Latvia vs New Zealand: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Latvia
92.32
in 2014
New Zealand
91.89
in 2014
Latvia rank
34th
New Zealand rank
35th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Latvia
- New Zealand
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 92.32 against 91.89 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
Latvia ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 35th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.86 | 89.62 | 4.76 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 91.54 | 91.51 | 0.0231 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Latvia or New Zealand?
- Latvia, at 92.32 against 91.89 in New Zealand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Latvia and New Zealand?
- 0.43, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Latvia ranks 34th and New Zealand ranks 35th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.