Kuwait vs United States: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Kuwait
84.35
in 2014
United States
83.65
in 2014
Kuwait rank
77th
United States rank
79th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Kuwait
- United States
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 84.35 against 83.65 in United States, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United States ahead.
Kuwait ranks 77th and United States ranks 79th of 183 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.45 | 82.35 | 5.9 | United States |
| 2010s | 80.52 | 82.6 | 2.08 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Kuwait or United States?
- Kuwait, at 84.35 against 83.65 in United States as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Kuwait and United States?
- 0.7, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and United States?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kuwait and United States rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Kuwait ranks 77th and United States ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.