Kuwait vs Nicaragua: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Kuwait
84.35
in 2014
Nicaragua
84.43
in 2014
Kuwait rank
77th
Nicaragua rank
76th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Kuwait
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 84.43 against 84.35 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 77th and Nicaragua ranks 76th of 183 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.45 | 68.07 | 8.38 | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 80.52 | 80.1 | 0.4215 | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Kuwait or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 84.43 against 84.35 in Kuwait as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Kuwait and Nicaragua?
- 0.08, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Nicaragua?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kuwait and Nicaragua rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Kuwait ranks 77th and Nicaragua ranks 76th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.