Kosovo vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Kosovo
75.82
in 2014
Tonga
97.66
in 2014
Kosovo rank
1st
Tonga rank
3rd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Kosovo
  • Tonga
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 97.66 against 75.82 in Kosovo, a difference of 21.84.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.3 times Kosovo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Kosovo ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 3rd of 1 groups.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 59.7 97.24 37.54 Tonga
2010s 69.14 97.29 28.15 Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Kosovo or Tonga?
Tonga, at 97.66 against 75.82 in Kosovo as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Kosovo and Tonga?
21.84, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Tonga?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Kosovo and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Kosovo ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.