South Korea vs Oman: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
South Korea
94.2
in 2014
Oman
94.11
in 2014
South Korea rank
16th
Oman rank
17th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- South Korea
- Oman
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 94.2 against 94.11 in Oman, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Oman ahead.
South Korea ranks 16th and Oman ranks 17th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.86 | 93.4 | 2.55 | Oman |
| 2010s | 94.68 | 93.08 | 1.6 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), South Korea or Oman?
- South Korea, at 94.2 against 94.11 in Oman as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between South Korea and Oman?
- 0.09, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Oman?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Oman rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- South Korea ranks 16th and Oman ranks 17th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.