Kiribati vs Portugal: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Kiribati
90.38
in 2014
Portugal
90.12
in 2014
Kiribati rank
40th
Portugal rank
44th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Kiribati
- Portugal
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 90.38 against 90.12 in Portugal, a difference of 0.26.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Portugal ahead.
Kiribati ranks 40th and Portugal ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.33 | 89.34 | 6.01 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 91.22 | 90.16 | 1.06 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Kiribati or Portugal?
- Kiribati, at 90.38 against 90.12 in Portugal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Kiribati and Portugal?
- 0.26, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Portugal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kiribati and Portugal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Kiribati ranks 40th and Portugal ranks 44th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.