Israel vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Israel
96.51
in 2014
Malaysia
96.6
in 2014
Israel rank
5th
Malaysia rank
4th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Israel
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 96.6 against 96.51 in Israel, a difference of 0.09.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 5th and Malaysia ranks 4th of 183 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 93.98 | 97.83 | 3.84 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 95.92 | 97.92 | 2 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Israel or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 96.6 against 96.51 in Israel as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Israel and Malaysia?
- 0.09, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Malaysia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Israel and Malaysia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Israel ranks 5th and Malaysia ranks 4th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.