Indonesia vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Indonesia
95.06
in 2014
Sri Lanka
94.29
in 2014
Indonesia rank
12th
Sri Lanka rank
15th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Indonesia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 95.06 against 94.29 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.77.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Indonesia ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.84 | 85.36 | 0.5214 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 93.55 | 91.94 | 1.62 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Indonesia or Sri Lanka?
- Indonesia, at 95.06 against 94.29 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Indonesia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.77, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Indonesia ranks 12th and Sri Lanka ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.