Indonesia vs Samoa: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Indonesia
95.06
in 2014
Samoa
95.62
in 2014
Indonesia rank
12th
Samoa rank
9th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Indonesia
  • Samoa
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 95.62 against 95.06 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.56.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 12th and Samoa ranks 9th of 181 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 84.84 91.39 6.55 Samoa
2010s 93.55 95.3 1.75 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Indonesia or Samoa?
Samoa, at 95.62 against 95.06 in Indonesia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Indonesia and Samoa?
0.56, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Samoa?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Indonesia and Samoa rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Indonesia ranks 12th and Samoa ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.