Iceland vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Iceland
77.78
in 2014
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
75.82
in 2014
Iceland rank
121st
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
124th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Iceland
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 77.78 against 75.82 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 1.96.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 121st and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 124th of 184 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.33 | 59.7 | 9.63 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 75.61 | 69.14 | 6.46 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Iceland or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Iceland, at 77.78 against 75.82 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Iceland and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 1.96, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Iceland and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Iceland ranks 121st and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 124th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.