Hungary vs Latvia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Hungary
91.54
in 2014
Latvia
92.32
in 2014
Hungary rank
37th
Latvia rank
34th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Hungary
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 92.32 against 91.54 in Hungary, a difference of 0.78.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 37th and Latvia ranks 34th of 181 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.27 | 84.86 | 0.5858 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 89.04 | 91.54 | 2.5 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Hungary or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 92.32 against 91.54 in Hungary as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Hungary and Latvia?
- 0.78, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Latvia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hungary and Latvia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Hungary ranks 37th and Latvia ranks 34th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.