Hungary vs Kiribati: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Hungary
91.54
in 2014
Kiribati
90.38
in 2014
Hungary rank
37th
Kiribati rank
40th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Hungary
- Kiribati
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 91.54 against 90.38 in Kiribati, a difference of 1.16.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 37th and Kiribati ranks 40th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.27 | 83.33 | 0.9412 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 89.04 | 91.22 | 2.19 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Hungary or Kiribati?
- Hungary, at 91.54 against 90.38 in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Hungary and Kiribati?
- 1.16, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Kiribati?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hungary and Kiribati rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Hungary ranks 37th and Kiribati ranks 40th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.