Hong Kong vs Viet Nam: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Hong Kong
96.51
in 2014
Viet Nam
95.89
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
5th
Viet Nam rank
8th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Hong Kong
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 96.51 against 95.89 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.62.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 8th of 184 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.23 | 82.91 | 13.32 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 96.18 | 92.73 | 3.45 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Hong Kong or Viet Nam?
- Hong Kong, at 96.51 against 95.89 in Viet Nam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Hong Kong and Viet Nam?
- 0.62, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Viet Nam?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Viet Nam rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Hong Kong ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 8th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.