How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Tonga?

10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong, China vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)

Hong Kong, China

96.51

in 2014

Tonga

97.66

in 2014

Hong Kong, China rank

5th

Tonga rank

3rd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time

Hong Kong, China
Tonga

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 97.66 against 96.51 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1.15.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 5th and Tonga ranks 3rd of 184 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong, China	Tonga	Difference	Ahead
2000s	96.23	92.66	3.57	Hong Kong, China
2010s	96.18	97.29	1.11	Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Hong Kong, China or Tonga?: Tonga, at 97.66 against 96.51 in Hong Kong, China as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Hong Kong, China and Tonga?: 1.15, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Tonga?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong, China and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?: Hong Kong, China ranks 5th and Tonga ranks 3rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/tonga/">Hong Kong, China vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.