Hong Kong vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Hong Kong
96.51
in 2014
Malaysia
96.6
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
5th
Malaysia rank
4th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Hong Kong
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 96.6 against 96.51 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 5th and Malaysia ranks 4th of 184 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.23 | 97.83 | 1.6 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 96.18 | 97.92 | 1.74 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Hong Kong or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 96.6 against 96.51 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Hong Kong and Malaysia?
- 0.09, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malaysia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Malaysia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Hong Kong ranks 5th and Malaysia ranks 4th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.