Haiti vs Madagascar: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Haiti
78.93
in 2014
Madagascar
78.93
in 2014
Haiti rank
109th
Madagascar rank
109th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Haiti
- Madagascar
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 78.93 against 78.93 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Madagascar ahead.
Haiti ranks 109th and Madagascar ranks 109th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.58 | 61 | 5.42 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 75.2 | 74.38 | 0.8176 | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Haiti or Madagascar?
- Haiti, at 78.93 against 78.93 in Madagascar as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Haiti and Madagascar?
- 0, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Madagascar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Haiti and Madagascar rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Haiti ranks 109th and Madagascar ranks 109th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.