Guinea vs Romania: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Guinea
80.26
in 2014
Romania
80
in 2014
Guinea rank
100th
Romania rank
102nd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Guinea
  • Romania
20406080200520092014

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 80.26 against 80 in Romania, a difference of 0.26.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Romania ahead.

Guinea ranks 100th and Romania ranks 102nd of 181 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 40.58 73.78 33.2 Romania
2010s 72.58 78.91 6.34 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Guinea or Romania?
Guinea, at 80.26 against 80 in Romania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Guinea and Romania?
0.26, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Romania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guinea and Romania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Guinea ranks 100th and Romania ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.