Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Guinea-Bissau
70.92
in 2014
Lesotho
70.23
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
136th
Lesotho rank
137th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Lesotho
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 70.92 against 70.23 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.69.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lesotho ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 136th and Lesotho ranks 137th of 183 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.01 | 68.85 | 2.84 | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 69.52 | 71.3 | 1.78 | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Guinea-Bissau or Lesotho?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 70.92 against 70.23 in Lesotho as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
- 0.69, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 136th and Lesotho ranks 137th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.