Guatemala vs Switzerland: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Guatemala
80.88
in 2014
Switzerland
80.97
in 2014
Guatemala rank
98th
Switzerland rank
95th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Guatemala
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 80.97 against 80.88 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Switzerland ahead.
Guatemala ranks 98th and Switzerland ranks 95th of 183 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.26 | 80.3 | 14.04 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 79.67 | 80.19 | 0.5279 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Guatemala or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 80.97 against 80.88 in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Guatemala and Switzerland?
- 0.09, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Switzerland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Switzerland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Guatemala ranks 98th and Switzerland ranks 95th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.