Guatemala vs Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Guatemala
80.88
in 2014
Guinea
80.26
in 2014
Guatemala rank
97th
Guinea rank
100th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Guatemala
- Guinea
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 80.88 against 80.26 in Guinea, a difference of 0.62.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 97th and Guinea ranks 100th of 181 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.26 | 40.58 | 25.68 | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 79.67 | 72.58 | 7.09 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Guatemala or Guinea?
- Guatemala, at 80.88 against 80.26 in Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Guatemala and Guinea?
- 0.62, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guatemala and Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Guatemala ranks 97th and Guinea ranks 100th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.