Grenada vs Lesotho: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Grenada
68.01
in 2014
Lesotho
70.23
in 2014
Grenada rank
137th
Lesotho rank
135th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Grenada
  • Lesotho
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 70.23 against 68.01 in Grenada, a difference of 2.22.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 137th and Lesotho ranks 135th of 181 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 60.17 68.85 8.68 Lesotho
2010s 66.3 71.3 5 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Grenada or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 70.23 against 68.01 in Grenada as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Grenada and Lesotho?
2.22, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Lesotho?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Grenada and Lesotho rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Grenada ranks 137th and Lesotho ranks 135th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.