Greece vs Norway: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Greece
86.39
in 2014
Norway
86.3
in 2014
Greece rank
62nd
Norway rank
63rd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Greece
  • Norway
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Greece currently reports 86.39 against 86.3 in Norway, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Norway ahead.

Greece ranks 62nd and Norway ranks 63rd of 181 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 82.13 91.3 9.16 Norway
2010s 85.7 86.67 0.9696 Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Greece or Norway?
Greece, at 86.39 against 86.3 in Norway as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Greece and Norway?
0.09, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Norway?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Greece and Norway rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Greece ranks 62nd and Norway ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.