Ghana vs Puerto Rico: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Ghana
82.39
in 2014
Puerto Rico
82.57
in 2014
Ghana rank
86th
Puerto Rico rank
84th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Ghana
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 82.57 against 82.39 in Ghana, a difference of 0.18.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 86th and Puerto Rico ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.29 | 79.1 | 33.81 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 75.13 | 82.51 | 7.38 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Ghana or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 82.57 against 82.39 in Ghana as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Ghana and Puerto Rico?
- 0.18, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Puerto Rico?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Ghana and Puerto Rico rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Ghana ranks 86th and Puerto Rico ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.