Germany vs Micronesia (country): Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Germany
87.9
in 2014
Micronesia (country)
87.99
in 2014
Germany rank
57th
Micronesia (country) rank
56th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Germany
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 87.99 against 87.9 in Germany, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 57th and Micronesia (country) ranks 56th of 181 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.56 | 81.09 | 9.48 | Germany |
| 2010s | 88.92 | 86.75 | 2.18 | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Germany or Micronesia (country)?
- Micronesia (country), at 87.99 against 87.9 in Germany as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Germany and Micronesia (country)?
- 0.09, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Micronesia (country)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Germany and Micronesia (country) rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Germany ranks 57th and Micronesia (country) ranks 56th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.