Finland vs Samoa: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Finland
95.44
in 2014
Samoa
95.62
in 2014
Finland rank
10th
Samoa rank
9th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Finland
  • Samoa
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 95.62 against 95.44 in Finland, a difference of 0.18.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 10th and Samoa ranks 9th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 96.57 91.39 5.18 Finland
2010s 94.99 95.3 0.3101 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Finland or Samoa?
Samoa, at 95.62 against 95.44 in Finland as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Finland and Samoa?
0.18, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Samoa?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Finland and Samoa rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Finland ranks 10th and Samoa ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.