Ethiopia vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Ethiopia
53.98
in 2014
Uganda
46.61
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
162nd
Uganda rank
163rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Ethiopia
- Uganda
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 53.98 against 46.61 in Uganda, a difference of 7.37.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uganda ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 162nd and Uganda ranks 163rd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0127 | 2.35 | 2.33 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 38.82 | 36.85 | 1.97 | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Ethiopia or Uganda?
- Ethiopia, at 53.98 against 46.61 in Uganda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Ethiopia and Uganda?
- 7.37, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Ethiopia and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Ethiopia ranks 162nd and Uganda ranks 163rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.