Ethiopia vs Malawi: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Ethiopia
53.98
in 2014
Malawi
55.14
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
161st
Malawi rank
159th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Ethiopia
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 55.14 against 53.98 in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.16.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malawi ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 161st and Malawi ranks 159th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0127 | 3.91 | 3.89 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 38.82 | 38.14 | 0.6753 | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Ethiopia or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 55.14 against 53.98 in Ethiopia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Ethiopia and Malawi?
- 1.16, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Malawi?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Ethiopia and Malawi rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Ethiopia ranks 161st and Malawi ranks 159th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.