Eswatini vs Paraguay: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Eswatini
66.68
in 2014
Paraguay
66.14
in 2014
Eswatini rank
142nd
Paraguay rank
145th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Eswatini
- Paraguay
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 66.68 against 66.14 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.54.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Paraguay ahead.
Eswatini ranks 142nd and Paraguay ranks 145th of 183 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.98 | 66.24 | 18.26 | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 63.03 | 68.87 | 5.85 | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Eswatini or Paraguay?
- Eswatini, at 66.68 against 66.14 in Paraguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Eswatini and Paraguay?
- 0.54, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Paraguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Paraguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Eswatini ranks 142nd and Paraguay ranks 145th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.