Estonia vs Latvia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Estonia
92.42
in 2014
Latvia, Republic of
92.32
in 2014
Estonia rank
31st
Latvia, Republic of rank
34th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Estonia
- Latvia, Republic of
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 92.42 against 92.32 in Latvia, Republic of, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 31st and Latvia, Republic of ranks 34th of 183 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Latvia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.22 | 84.86 | 5.36 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 91.93 | 91.54 | 0.3922 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Estonia or Latvia, Republic of?
- Estonia, at 92.42 against 92.32 in Latvia, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Estonia and Latvia, Republic of?
- 0.1, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Latvia, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Estonia and Latvia, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Estonia ranks 31st and Latvia, Republic of ranks 34th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.